I have had a basinful of people blaming the Lib Dems for the failure of government policy. Don't they understand that we didn't win the election, and that we are in a Coalition Government. Cannot they see that the Lib Dems have had to make more and bigger compromises, and sacrifices than we have. Both parties have members and activists which have to allowed for. Its how coalitions work. Today we had William Langley in the Telegraph blaming the Lib Dems for there being no vote on repeal of the ban on hunting with dogs. Its got nothing whatsoever to do with the Lib Dems. The only MPs who have surprised me by their opposition to repeal are Conservative MPs. Its just that its not the right time to use parliamentary time on this issue.
This blog has touched on this before. It was the ban, (as illiberal and grotesque a piece of legislation as can be imagined), which the Prime Minister responsible for bringing it in is ashamed of which fired my public support for hunting. It led me to become an enthusiastic supporter of local hunts, and the Tanatside now meets every season on my farm. I fully understand the frustrations of Alice Barnard, Chief Exec of the Countryside Alliance who is widely quoted in the article. It is badly drafted, has probably increased cruelty in the dispatch of foxes, and has led to no more than 6 prosecutions which would not have been illegal before the ban was introduced. This Act should be repealed, but there is no point whatsoever having a vote on the issue while MPs are so engrossed in other matters that it will probably not be approved. And this has got nothing to do with my coalition colleagues, the Lib Dems. Rant over.
2 comments:
Countryside Alliance = Fox Hunting Alliance it seems to be a single agenda group.
As to them being up in arms well I'm sorry but you can not pick and choose which laws or acts of parliament to follow. Afterall do we not live in a democracy? We choose parliamentary members to institute laws and as such once decided upon they have to be followed until repealed.
As for foxes suffering I'm sure a quick despatch with a gun or poison is preferable to the other alternative. Afterall it works well enough for rabbits!
Lets not kid ourselves that the CA are anything but a select minority throwing their teddies out of the cot because someone told them what to do for a change.
As part of the rural community I dislike the whole exclusive, clubby lot of them because they act as if they still live in feudal Britain.
From country lover griffiths of montgomeryshire
NO,the ban was NOT ILLIBERAL! it is likeour opposition to the privatisation of our forests -the overwhelming majority of our country AND MPs opposed & voted against this CRUEL &OUTDATED EXPLOITATION OF OUR NATIVE WILDLIFE FOR HUMAN PLEASURE (little different to bullfighting). However you dress it up,it has nothing to do with controlling foxes. Grow up & get your kicks elsewhere
THIS IS SUPPOSED TO BE A DEMOCRACY,THE MAJORITY WIN THE VOTE, YOUVE BEEN OUTVOTED- YOU DO NOTKEEP VOTING ON IT UNTIL YOU GET THE ANSWER THE CA WANT!!!!! IT DOESNT BELONG IN A CIVILIZED SOCIETY. LONG LIVE THE BAN!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Post a Comment